Alli vs Proactol comparison

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

With so many slimming products on the market claiming to be the best it is not easy to decide which one to buy.

With this in mind, we decided to make a side-by-side comparison of two very popular fat binding slimming tablets to help you choose.

Both Alli and Proactol are leading fat binders that work in a similar way, to reduce the amount of fat absorbed from your meal.

Best fat binder – side-by-side comparison

Alli weight loss Proactol fat binder
Effectiveness stars-4-0 stars-5-0
Ease of use stars-2-0Restricted to 12 weeks usage (FSA)
Side-effects affect timing of use!
stars-5-0Use lifelong
Clinical testing stars-4-0 stars-4-05 successful trials
Medical backing stars-4-0Main ingredient Orlistat has been shown to work stars-4-0Approved medical device
Side effects stars-1-0Bloating, gas, incontinence, diarrhoea, gall bladder problems and potential liver damage stars-5-0No reported side-effects
Price stars-4-0From £45 per month stars-4-0From £40 per month
Discounts available (see below)
Buy Buy Alli Buy Proactol

Alli or Proactol – which fat binder?

Looking at Alli and Proactol side-by-side you can see how Proactol is the better fat binder.

There is little doubt that Alli works as a fat binder – the number of side effects using Alli and recent concern of the link to liver problems are big factors when considering the alli slimming tablet.

Proactol recommended

When looking for a fat binder that is clinically proven to help you lose weight we would recommend Proactol.

If you are about to go on holiday get 15% off – available on all weight loss packages 3 months or above!

Promotion code: SUMPR1